14年考研英语
14年考研英语
我这里有14年英语一两篇阅读真题，你看看吧，或许对你有帮助Text 1 In order to “change lives for the better” and reduce “dependency”, George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the "upfront work search" scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the job centre with a CV, register for the online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on.” he claimed, “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand was his zeal for “fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.Losing a job is hurting: you don’t skip down to the job centre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever –tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase “jobseeker’s allowance” is about redefining the unemployed as a “jobseeker” who had no fundamental right to benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited “allowance”, conditional on actively seeking a job: no entitlement and no insurance, at £71.70 a week ,one of the least generous in the EU. 21. George Osborne’s scheme was intended to [A] provide the unemployed with easier access to benefits.[B] encourage jobseeker’ s active engagement in job seeking. [C] motivate the unemployed to report voluntarily. [D] guarantee jobseekers’ legitimate right to benefit. 22. The phase “to sign on”(Line 3,Para.2)most probably means [A] to check on the availability of jobs at the job centre. [B] to accept the government’s restrictions on the government. [C] to register for an allowance from the government. [D] to attend a governmental job-training program. 23. What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme? [A] A desire to secure a better life for all. [B] An eagerness to protect the unemployed. [C] An urge to be generous to the claimants. [D] A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers. 24. According to Paragraph 3, being unemployed makes one feel [A] uneasy. [B] enraged. [C] insulted. [D] guilty. 25. To which of the following would the author most probably agree? [A] The British welfare system indulges jobseekers’ laziness. [B] Osborne’s reform will reduce the risk of unemployment. [C] The jobseekers’ allowance has met their actual needs. [D] Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.Text 2All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism. But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.During the decade before the economic crisis, spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation. The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money, tempting ever more students to pile into law schools. But most law graduates never get a big-firm job. Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.There are many reasons for this. One is the excessive costs of a legal education. There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states; a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject, then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. This leaves today’s average law-school graduate with $100,000 of debt on top of undergraduate debts. Law-school debt means that they have to work fearsomely hard.Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers. Sensible ideas have been around for a long time, but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them. One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraduate degree. Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school. If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer, those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so. Students who do need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm. This keeps fees high and innovation slow. There is pressure for change from within the profession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would reduce costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’ efficiency. After all, other countries, such as Australia and Britain, have started liberalizing their legal professions. America should follow. 26. A lot of students take up law as their profession due to[A] the growing demand from clients[B] the increasing pressure of inflation[C] the prospect of working in big firms[D] the attraction of financial rewards27. Which of the following adds to the costs of legal education in most American states?[A] Higher tuition fees for undergraduate studies [B] Receiving training by professional associations[C] Admissions approval from the bar association[D] Pursuing a bachelors degree in another major28. Hindrance to the reform of the legal system originates from[A] the rigid bodies governing the profession[B] lawyers’ and clients’ strong resistance[C] the stern exam for would-be lawyers.[D] non-professionals’ sharp criticism29. The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive” partly because[A] prevents lawyers from gaining due profits.[B] bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession.[C] aggravates the ethical situation in the trade.[D] keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares.30. In the text, the author mainly discusses[A] the factors that help make a successful lawyer in America.[B] a problem in America’s legal profession and solutions to it.[C] the role undergraduate studies in America’s legal education.[D] flawed ownership of America’s law firms and its causes.
我觉得很难，哈哈，因为我一直英语很烂，阅读全是乱写 ，哎 今年考研无希望了，收拾东西寒假滚回家找工作去喽
难。。阅读特难。。要是去年我阅读至少32分。。今年也就是24分。。不容易入手。。别的还行。。
你好：考试难不难，是一个相对的概念，会者不难，不会不难，因人而异。去年我们考研初试结束后，都喊难，学校考研的一片惆怅，结果等2月6日初试成绩出来时，一个比一个考的好，倒是有一个现象值得注意，当时感觉考的好同学，反而成绩到低了，到愁了。考研结束后，无论感觉考的如何，都不要过于太刻意，淡定等到初试成绩的出来。凡是准备二战的，无论成绩是否出来，都要义无反顾的坚持去复习，尤其应届毕业考研感觉失利的同学，还想二战的同学更要如此。
14年考研英语1
2014年的英语考试已经比去年较难，考研阅读特点之一是文章很难读懂，有些考生由于词汇量小，句子分析能力差，根本读不懂文章，所以也无法考到理想的分数。其次是选项迷惑性大，排除错误选项需要很多时间，而且不一定选对。作为考研英语试卷体系中发展最成熟、题型最稳定的部分，阅读主要考查的是考生理解文章结构、把握具体信息和解答不同类型题目的能力。
2014考研英语一不难。考研英语复习计划：1、重点是考研词汇、基本语法，同时，阅读理解训练也要开始。语法等不会有什么变化，词汇每年大纲虽然有所修订，但变动不大，因此找本前一年的《大纲》先看着。有许多同学正好在这一阶段考CET6级，由于6级和考研难度大致相当，词汇量也差不多，所以可以结合起来复习。2、词汇方面，应该在已经大体掌握意思的基础上，开始深入掌握用法，尤其是固定搭配和习惯用法。另一个重点是解决长难句，掌握各种句式。同时要加大阅读量，一方面提高阅读能力，另一方面也通过阅读来巩固语法、词汇和句式。本阶段必须进行相当量的题型专项练习，通过做题来巩固。3、冲刺复习阶段的重要任务也有两个，一是进行大量模考练习，二是强化训练短文写作。对短文写作的强化，首先要对可能的命题范围作出预测。考研英语作文命题不会冷僻，不会很专业，通常都与学习生活紧密联系，或反映当前社会热点问题。例如保持健康、如何读书、环境保护、乱承诺等都曾是出题范围。了解到这些大概范围后，有意识地多阅读一些相关文章，熟悉有关观点、句式、词汇，多动笔写写，在考场上就可成竹在胸。
023年考研英语百度网盘下载
考研资料实时更新链接：
简介：2023年考研英语复习资料、考研英语复习规划、考研英语大纲，考研英语真题等合集
链接：
提取码：6666
这里有考研历年英语真题及讲解，如果资源有问题随时追问
14年考研英语2
难度不是很大，但是肯定是要付出努力的。
2014年考研英语二的难度要稍高于2013年，难度上升主要体现在阅读理解上面，今年的试题更加偏向于一些很细微的细节考核。
尽管整个英语二的难度比2013年要稍微难一点，但在主观题阅卷的时候，掌握的标准会稍微松一点，英语二的分数线跟去年相比基本会保持一致，应该不会有太大的变化。
英语知识运用
该部分不仅考查考生对不同语境中规范的语言要素（包括词汇、表达方式和结构）的掌握程度，而且还考查考生对语段特征（如连贯性和一致性等）的辨识能力等。共20小题，每小题0.5分，共10分。
在一篇240-280词的文章中留出20个空白，要求考生从每题给出的4个选项中选出最佳答案。
难度必须高了，
不难。
虽然2014年考研英语二难度上升主要体现在阅读理解上面，试题更加偏向于一些很细微的细节考核，但在主观题阅卷的时候，掌握的标准会稍微松一点，英语二的分数线相比基本会保持一致，应该不会有太大的变化。
考研英语考试内容试题分三部分，包括英语知识运用、阅读理解和写作。英语知识运用考查考生对不同语境中规范的语言要素（包括词汇、表达方式和结构）的掌握程度，而且还考查考生对语段特征（如连贯性和一致性等）的辨识能力等。
阅读理解该部分由A、B、C三节组成，考查考生理解书面英语的能力。A节考查考生理解主旨要义、具体信息、概念性含义；B节考查考生对诸如连贯性、一致性等语段特征以及文章结构的理解。C节主要考查考生准确理解概念或结构较复杂的英语文字材料的能力。
考研英语14
我这里有14年英语一两篇阅读真题，你看看吧，或许对你有帮助Text 1 In order to “change lives for the better” and reduce “dependency”, George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the "upfront work search" scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the job centre with a CV, register for the online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on.” he claimed, “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand was his zeal for “fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.Losing a job is hurting: you don’t skip down to the job centre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever –tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase “jobseeker’s allowance” is about redefining the unemployed as a “jobseeker” who had no fundamental right to benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited “allowance”, conditional on actively seeking a job: no entitlement and no insurance, at £71.70 a week ,one of the least generous in the EU. 21. George Osborne’s scheme was intended to [A] provide the unemployed with easier access to benefits.[B] encourage jobseeker’ s active engagement in job seeking. [C] motivate the unemployed to report voluntarily. [D] guarantee jobseekers’ legitimate right to benefit. 22. The phase “to sign on”(Line 3,Para.2)most probably means [A] to check on the availability of jobs at the job centre. [B] to accept the government’s restrictions on the government. [C] to register for an allowance from the government. [D] to attend a governmental job-training program. 23. What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme? [A] A desire to secure a better life for all. [B] An eagerness to protect the unemployed. [C] An urge to be generous to the claimants. [D] A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers. 24. According to Paragraph 3, being unemployed makes one feel [A] uneasy. [B] enraged. [C] insulted. [D] guilty. 25. To which of the following would the author most probably agree? [A] The British welfare system indulges jobseekers’ laziness. [B] Osborne’s reform will reduce the risk of unemployment. [C] The jobseekers’ allowance has met their actual needs. [D] Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.Text 2All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism. But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.During the decade before the economic crisis, spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation. The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money, tempting ever more students to pile into law schools. But most law graduates never get a big-firm job. Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.There are many reasons for this. One is the excessive costs of a legal education. There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states; a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject, then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. This leaves today’s average law-school graduate with $100,000 of debt on top of undergraduate debts. Law-school debt means that they have to work fearsomely hard.Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers. Sensible ideas have been around for a long time, but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them. One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraduate degree. Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school. If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer, those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so. Students who do need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm. This keeps fees high and innovation slow. There is pressure for change from within the profession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would reduce costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’ efficiency. After all, other countries, such as Australia and Britain, have started liberalizing their legal professions. America should follow. 26. A lot of students take up law as their profession due to[A] the growing demand from clients[B] the increasing pressure of inflation[C] the prospect of working in big firms[D] the attraction of financial rewards27. Which of the following adds to the costs of legal education in most American states?[A] Higher tuition fees for undergraduate studies [B] Receiving training by professional associations[C] Admissions approval from the bar association[D] Pursuing a bachelors degree in another major28. Hindrance to the reform of the legal system originates from[A] the rigid bodies governing the profession[B] lawyers’ and clients’ strong resistance[C] the stern exam for would-be lawyers.[D] non-professionals’ sharp criticism29. The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive” partly because[A] prevents lawyers from gaining due profits.[B] bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession.[C] aggravates the ethical situation in the trade.[D] keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares.30. In the text, the author mainly discusses[A] the factors that help make a successful lawyer in America.[B] a problem in America’s legal profession and solutions to it.[C] the role undergraduate studies in America’s legal education.[D] flawed ownership of America’s law firms and its causes.
2014年考研英语一阅读难度大。
能掌握5500左右的词汇以及相关词组。除掌握词汇的基本含义外，考生还应掌握词汇之间的词义关系，如同义词、近义词、反义词等;掌握词汇之间的搭配关系，如动词与介词、形容词与介词、形容词与名词等;掌握词汇生成的基本知识，如词源、词根、词缀等。
题型分布不同：
1、英语一 (满分：100)
Section I：英语知识运用 20×0.5分
Section II：Part A 传统阅读20×2分
Part B 新题型 5×2分
Part C 英译汉5×2分
Section III：Part A 应用文 10分
Part B 文章写作 20分
2、英语二 (满分：100)
Section I：英语知识运用 20×0.5分
Section II：Part A 传统阅读20×2分
Part B 新题型 5×2分
Section III：英译汉 15分
Section IV：Part A 应用文 10分
Part B 文章写作 15分
不是很难 只要好好研究真题 把真题做透就行了 作文的话多准备几个句子 把它背熟 到时候灵活运用就下笔如有神
英语的复习大致可分为四个阶段： 1、3月—6月，这是考研复习的第一个阶段。在这个阶段，主要任务是解决单词问题。词汇量是考研英语的根本。教育部大纲中规定的是5500个单词，那么你对自己的要求只能是高于这个数字，因为大纲中还涉及到了与你的专业和个人兴趣相关的单词，所以单词复习是一个需要详细制定计划，并且循序渐进的过程。 第一轮背单词时，绝对要认真仔细，应该从以下五个方面来进行准备：一、单词发音；二、单词词缀；三、单词词义；四、单词用法；五、单词关系(考生应掌握单词的同义词，反义词，派生词等)。 另外，阅读在这个阶段，也应该定量定篇的进行。考研阅读不但考理解，还考速度。因此，在平时的阅读训练中要学会浏览阅读和快速阅读的方式。在阅读文章时，不断的提高对自己阅读时间的要求，一段时间后，你一定会发现，你阅读的效率与答题的速度突飞猛进。 2、7月至9月底是全面复习的第二阶段。如果说第一阶段主要是打基础，那么，第二个阶段则开始进行全方位准备了。所谓全面复习，即大家应该开始拿起笔练习写作和翻译，不只是停留在背单词和读文章这个层面上。因为在前期阶段，你已掌握了大量的单词并进行了高强度的阅读训练，所以这个阶段，应该开始试着用英语表达你的想法，并且检查自己对英语的理解能力。在这个阶段不但应该解决了所有的基础问题，同时还要有一段时间进行提高，为下一步的全程模拟做好充分的准备。建议你可以采取上辅导班或自学相结合的方式。 3、10月至11月底是强化阶段，是进行模拟强化和真题总结的时期。在此之前，一些权威的考研辅导专家一般会推出根据新大纲编写的模拟试题集。大家通过做最新模拟试题以及综合研究真题的收获，可以体验实战的感觉。强化阶段的英语复习计划应该更倾向于综合训练与模拟，但是同时，也不要忘记单词的巩固与记忆。 4、12月份到考前，是冲刺阶段。考生们不但需要调整好临考前的心态，而且也要静下心来进行查缺补漏。比如说，翻译部分没有练习过或者比较薄弱，那么这段时间里，你需要针对个人弱势调整复习重点和时间，对弱势考点进行突破。如果不重视这些将会有可能前功尽弃。 另外，同学们在考前应该保持一个良好的心态。如果身体状况不佳，心理素质差，即便是有比较好的英语基础，复习比较充分，也未必在考场上有良好的表现。
14年考研英语二国家线
考研英语二40-50分左右。
每年考研成绩公布后不久，便会公布当年的考研国家线。如若考生英语二分数达到了国家线，那就是我们常说的“过线”了。考研英语二国家线一般都是40-50分左右，每年的国家线都不一定相同，且不同的专业对考研英语的划线也会有所不同。因此判断考研英语二是否过线需要以当年官方发布的国家线为准。
国家线只是最低要求，过了这个线是否可以参加复试，取决于各硕士研究生招生单位依据报考人数、考试成绩以及招生计划、复试比例最终确定的招生单位具体考研复试分数线。有些招生单位院校线会高于国家线，有些会直接沿用国家线。
硕士研究生教育按照培养目标的不同，分为学术型研究生和专业学位研究生。学术型研究生的培养目标是高层次学术研究型专门人才，专业学位研究生的培养目标是具有扎实理论基础，并适应特定行业或职业实际工作需要的应用型高层次专门人才。
具有较强的解决实际问题的能力，能够承担专业技术或管理工作，具有良好的职业素养的高层次应用型专门人才。从2010年开始，全国硕士研究生入学考试的英语试卷分为了英语（一）和英语（二）。
学习英语的好处：
一、学习英语的好处有哪些之丰富知识面。英语是小学生必修的一门学科，单词、短语、句子和短文，都是学生在英语课上必须要学习的内容。正所谓“知识是丰富的精神食粮”，学习知识是我们一生应该去做的事。
二、学习英语的好处有哪些之拓宽视野。英语应该是大多数同学接触的第二门语言，在学习英语的过程中，我们可以了解到其他国家居民的生活方式、风俗习惯，这是我们拓宽视野最基础，是最简单的方法，也为我们将来走出国门提前打好基础，而不至于对新的环境一无所知。
三、学习英语的好处有哪些之提高个人优势。从我们在小学接触英语开始，一直到大学、研究生，甚至是出国留学，都离不开英语的学习。对于学生来说，如果能在英语考试中取得一个好成绩，就能增加自己被理想院校录取的可能性。
考研英语二国家分数线一般都是50-53分左右。
一，考研英语二应该考多少分
不同的专业对考研英语的划线会有所不同。一般来说，理科和工科的考研英语的划线要比文科的划线要低点然后，考研英语的划线每年都不太相同的。
具体要看当年的试卷难易程度和报考人数等等，总的来说，考研英语可以达60分的应该就是可以过国家线的了，但当然分数越高越好了最后。
考研英语二国家线大概在35-55分这个范围，每年的都有所不同。虽然35-55分这个分数线很低了，但是考研英语考试的难度较大，对于考研大部分同学来说难度很大的，能考过国家线已经很不容易。所以考研英语二过线起码要在55分之上。
二，考研英语一和二的区别主要有
1，概念不同
英语一，即原研究生入学统考“英语”，所有学术型硕士研究生（十三大门类，110个一级学科）和部分专业型硕士（法律硕士、临床医学硕士、口腔医学硕士、建筑学硕士、护理硕士、汉语国际教育硕士、公共卫生硕士等）必考英语一。
英语二，主要是为高等院校和科研院所招收不考英语二的专业学位硕士研究生而设置的具有选拔性质的统考科目。
2，考查词汇不同
英语一，考生应能掌握5500左右的词汇以及相关词组。除掌握词汇的基本含义外，考生还应掌握词汇之间的词义关系，如同义词、近义词、反义词等；掌握词汇之间的搭配关系，如动词与介词、形容词与介词、形容词与名词等；掌握词汇生成的基本知识，如词源、词根、词缀等。
考生应能较熟练的掌握5500个左右常用英语词汇以及相关常用词组。考生应能根据具体语境、句子结构或上下文理解一些非常用词的词义。
考研英语二历年国家线单科国家线大概在38-40分这个范围，每年的都有所不同。考研英语二历年国家线单科国家线大概在38到40分这个范围。过了总分数线却存在某一科目没过线这种情况也有机会进复试但机会并不是普遍存在的，有的院校规定可以用你的初试总成绩来抵单科线，比如，说A看了390分但英语只考了49分，而英语单科线为50分。＜br>但是学校规定考生可以用总分中的20分来抵1分单科线，那么A就可以选择这种方式来取得进入复试的机会。但是，他的初试成绩就变成了370分了，但是这种情况只存在于一部分院校，你所报考的院校具体有没有这样的政策，这需要你多去官网查、多往院校研究生院打电话进行询问。